Most striking in Albert Wendt’s fictional
thriller thus far, for me, has been the constant question of what in the
narration is “real” and how much that matters for the characters and the
readers. “How strange. All this is like a dream” is repeated a few times in the
first half of Black Rainbow, and it
seems to be a good indication of how the characters are responding to this futuristic
societal model. As we discussed while reading Invisible Cities, “reality” has many layers, and it’s possible to
be so immersed in a world that you stop seeing it for what it truly is. In
Wendt’s novel, we see our protagonist confronting this dilemma as he converses
with the street kids, struggling to understand how the world he lives in is
viewed from the outside, and possibly starting to see the subjectivity of
“reality.”
Fantail’s perspective of the President
and the Tribunal is unquestionably hostile, and while the protagonist sees the
Tribunal as his family because of what they have provided for him, Fantail
offers an alternative model of family through the story of Manu. “You see your
society as you believe it is,” Fantail tells him, and pointing out that the
reality he takes for granted is not a universal one. Based on his submission
and loyalty to the Tribunal, the protagonist can craft a very different reality
for himself than Fantail can, and this angers her because of the manipulation
she sees through creating this pleasurable existence. “Why don’t you get good
and honestly angry?” she screams at him. “Break out of your otherwolder
conditioning and brainwashing? Why don’t you?” From the vantage point of being
a reader of this novel, it’s fairly easy to side with Fantail. The Tribunal is
manipulative, clearly, and though we’ve predominantly heard this narrative from
the protagonist’s pro-Tribunal perspective, we’ve been shown enough to know not
to completely trust them. Outside of this novel, it is much harder to recognize
the lenses we wear while viewing our own reality and the realities that exist
outside our sphere of comfort. It’s harder to admit that we’ve been
conditioned, and even brainwashed, to see and think in ways that conform to our
society because of the benefits that provides. “I’m—I’m sorry,” the protagonist
mumbles, hurrying away upon hearing her testimony, but while avoidance of
differences is often a first reaction when crossing cultural boundaries, it
prevents authentic communion and an understanding of multiple realities.
No comments:
Post a Comment