Sia Figiel’s artful and poignant
book, They Who Do Not Grieve, seeks
an intimate connection with the reader through its form and unconventional
employment of language. It serves as a marked contrast with Albert Wendt’s
intentionally disorienting novel, Black
Rainbow, though Figiel was inspired by Wendt. While I was constantly trying
to find a ‘way in’ to Black Rainbow—that
is, a way into the internal logic and characters’ perspectives, which,
admittedly, was really difficult—with They
Who Do Not Grieve, I couldn’t separate myself emotionally from the
characters. I think this is entirely a product of Figiel’s expert use of
language. Figiel writes, “Language binds us together. Language and memories…
Memories. Secrets. Secrets that we alone know. That we will carry to our
graves, to our graves” (165). This application of language is exactly what the
characters use to seek communion with each other, and it is the same approach
that Figiel herself uses to tie us to the book.
Figiel’s language is in no way
confined by the implied style or traditional form of ‘novel’; she molds the
medium to express what might only seem possible through oral tradition. Figiel
telling us this story is much like Tausi’s late-night divulgences to Alofa,
when Tausi spun a “sinnet of memories” (142) while Alofa sat, physically
present but with her imagination souring and soul elevated out of her material
presence. Since the book is full of imagery and skips around through time to
tell these women’s stories, the act of reading feels like a memory a dream. As
different layers of their pasts are revealed, we as readers are being entrusted
with these secrets and do become bound together with the women by learning
their stories. Based on the acknowledgments page at the beginning of the book, I
assume that these stories are not personal accounts of individual Samoan women,
but are collective, collaborative memory—which means that we as readers are
invited into the tradition through virtue of knowing these stories.
The power of the unspoken thought and word is also a huge force of movement within the book. Even when we don’t know
exactly what’s going on (though we keep reading, hoping to find out), we can react emotionally. There is a fascinating
connection created through not quite knowing the truth, but feeling the meaning
regardless. It is like life—and this piece of literature models that imagery,
emotion and meaning can be conveyed more often through what is not said. As we
come to understand the truth through direct revelation, we often realize what
we have known all along without needing to be told. Upon finishing this book, I feel more comfortable saying that I experienced it than that I read it, just as a personal memory often holds more meaning than can be adequately put into words.
No comments:
Post a Comment